The 2022 AEC Integration Summit Recap: All Aboard the Train to Connect People and Data

The 2022 AEC Integration Summit Recap: All Aboard the Train to Connect People and Data Ding Ding. A bell chimes as the train leaves the station at the Denver, Colorado International Airport to make its way to Union Station. Some travelers are weary, and some are energized for the adventure that awaits. Meanwhile, train personnel walk up and down the train to ensure all have a ticket with the correct information on it. Whether those travelers leave the train at one stop or another, or they board another train with a transfer, the train ticket is paramount to get to where you want to go. In my case, my destination was the Construction Progress Coalition 2022 AEC Integration Summit that took place at the Hotel Kimpton Born, just a few steps away from Union Station. Like the train transportation system, the building asset supply chain in a construction project can appear on the surface to function in a comparable way. However, it is not that simple in practice, as I have explored further while participating in the Summit as a primary stakeholder, representing the building product manufacturer (BPM) for the MEP component team. Coming from a background of working for a building product manufacturer for almost a decade, I grew very much accustomed to not just processes but dealing with complexity, or as I like to say, “rolling with the punches.” I worked at the intersection of many distinct groups to support the real-life product as it existed in various software platforms for design purposes such as successful BIM implementation. BIM content itself is a digital asset, and quality matters with the help of supported processes in a supply chain. I learned so much from everyone I interacted with and found immense joy in making connections from various places. The ”train ticket” for me was (and still is) in the data. Visuals Enter the Common Data Exchange (or CDX, for short). According to the Construction Progress Coalition’s website, the “Common Data Exchange (CDX) is a framework for project stakeholders to communicate interoperability rules and requirements between two or more parties. CDX is not a standard, per se, but a visual representation of workflow and data exchange requirements between supply chain parties.” (Wood, Common Data Exchange (CDX)). Here is what I love about the Common Data Exchange concept. The fact that it is more focused on visual representation of a workflow is so refreshing. I have been a huge fan of mind maps, concept maps, and other forms of visual thinking for years. I even wrote an article about my experience in using visual mind maps in the November 2020 issue of AUGIWORLD magazine. The flexibility in displaying information in a more open way for different situations allows me to focus more on conveying ideas than on how to format them. It also helps us get away from the “we’ve always done it this way” trap if a certain situation calls for something different. That does not mean there is not a form of a structure though. The CDX framework used at the 2022 AEC Integration Summit included magnets and stickers with specific symbols representing documents, databases, current state, future state, connections, people doing certain activities, and more. Everything down to the actual sticky note color had a reason and meaning. The framework was there in visual symbols, but the actual idea conveying activities was flexible because all team stakeholders could move things around, write in words, and add lines and connections wherever it made sense on a large whiteboard. This proved to be extremely helpful because what is interesting between manufacturing and construction is that sometimes the same words can mean very different things to people in different roles. In an industry where there are so many buzz words and acronyms, any sort of clarity on what we are talking about would be greatly helpful! Linguistics This brings me to the next thing I enjoyed about collaborating with the team at the Summit. The facilitation of such an event really made us question everything down to the actual words we were using in the problem statement and what we were hoping for in the outcome. Yes, we even broke out the thesaurus and dictionary on a few occasions! The objective for the MEP component team looks like this, but I can tell you after working with the group that it does not necessarily mean that words are set in stone. Word choices really do matter and solving the most complex problems comes with asking the right questions in the first place. Perspectives People may say that they enjoyed an event, a group, or otherwise because of the “like-minded” individuals. I think, in this case, the only “like-minded” part is in a common goal to improve things across the entire industry. This event was full of different perspectives that can result in perceptions being different from intentions and contextual realities that are different but valid. A great visual often used in Systems Thinking is the story of “The Blind Men and the Elephant.” Essentially, the story goes on to describe how each person approached a different part of the elephant and concluded something different about it. This story illustrates those individual perceptions, while true and valid for that individual, can lead to miscommunication and conflict if we are not careful because it is not the full context (Saxe, 2015). Participating in the 2022 AEC Integration Summit gave us an opportunity to explore the context of our MEP System Component “elephant.” Put in another way, the summit allowed us to put the strengths of generalists and specialists to work. Naturally, the book “Range,” by David Epstein validated my experience in deliberately choosing to be more of a generalist and a connector in a world where specialization and depth in one specific domain are favorable (Epstein, 2019). However, when we are not careful, silos of data develop, duplicate and manual efforts take place, and trust is low. The thing is, I think